Facebook
Twitter
Subscribe to AlYunaniya - Greece and the Arab World by Email
  • Contact the Editor and tell us what you think about AlYunaniya.com…

  • Advertise with Alyunaniya.com… contact us with your request

  • Follow us on FACEBOOK and TWITTER; talk about it…

Posted on: July 28th, 2012 2 Comments

Why I ‘LIKEd’ London 2012 ceremony

Undoubtedly, Athens 2004 Olympics ceremony produced images and thoughts that only, perhaps China or Japan could compete in terms of historic depth, civilization, meanings and connotations about humanity. This is a true statement, but it serves also as a disclaimer to avoid a social network death, after this piece is posted. Hopefully.

London 2012 took a different approach. Some would say due to a lack of ancient history. True again. But not all peoples around the world have the privilege of looking at ancient ruins with nostalgia. Some are obliged to put serious efforts to work, to achieve progress on economic and social level. Other reasons are in play as well. British land was never conquered at least since Julius Caesar. Greek lands have been turned again and again in a theatre of wars and extreme politics; so different peoples, different storytelling.

In my view, London 2012 ceremony focused on two things: first, what made Great Britain what it is today and second, on today’s world reality and change.

They depicted change via constructing images that described progress, embraced differentiality and promoted contemporary culture elements. From the agrarian economy to the “dark satanic mills” of the industrial revolution, which began in the UK in the middle of the 18th century and swept throughout the rest of the world -transforming society and laying the foundations of the modern world in its wake- to post-industrial pop society and Sir Tim Berners-Lee, British computer scientist and the inventor of the World Wide Web.

In my opinion, there were two key moments of the ceremony that made a difference. The one was the ‘Mortality’ section by choreographer Akram Khan that featured 50 specially selected professional dancers, a 9-year-old boy and Khan himself, accompanied by the voice of Emeli Sandé singing Abide With Me. Khan’s work brought an infectious stillness to the Ceremony, a reminder of our own mortality and the transfer of possibilities and hopes between generations.

The second moment was the final stage of torch relay with the young athletes leading the way to the future. River Thames cruiser with Beckham and the young female footballer on board delivered the flame to an older but strong athlete who entered the stadium and handed over the torch to a group of young athletes, who, as a group, shared the final meters towards the final task. It was a symbolic mystagogy that praised values, beliefs and the human factor.

A lot of comments are already made about the British Olympic party. Cross-cultural differences allow for too many interpretations and expression of national complexes. My preferred was the one tweeted by UK’s Conservative MP Aidan Burley, who was sacked as a ministerial aide last year after he took part in a Nazi-themed stag party in the French Alps. He said the Olympics opening ceremony was “multicultural crap”, The Guardian writes. He described it as “the most leftie opening ceremony I have ever seen”.

Well, if the ‘Isles of Wonder’ managed to upset the extremists, it means that the social and political symbolisms were properly in place.

Dr. Demetris Kamaras is the Editor of AlYunaniya.com

2 Responses

  1. tomakrypodari says:

    What I strongly disliked about the London 2012 Olympics opening ceremony is that it lacked coherence and looked badly drawn up by the director. They tried to reference too many things in a way that made the direction of the whole thing and the visual outcome tiring and awkward…

    When the long distance camera was used, lots of things were taking place at the same time, industrial chimneys were being raised, lots of people moving…but it looked like a total mess from afar…so the director had to do some closeups to assume that more subjective perspective…
    When the director actually did short-distance shooting, it either looked even more chaotic, or it zoomed in on groups of people or individuals gazing around foolishly (sorry Kenneth Branagh), their reactions supposedly injecting meaning into the surrounding over-activity, or doing that ridiculous choreography.

    The general impression it gave me was that of cheap super-spectacle, like an expensive but uninspired american movie; an action film that has to look glorious and impressive, but is of “cheap” and “easy” aesthetics…cheap thrill all in all…

    And what about that ridiculous scene with James Bond and the Queen of England (aren’t we done with the royalty yet in Europe?) jumping off the helicopter (I held my breath for a second there) who looked like she had swallowed a lemon when all those around her (including Jacques Rogge) were giving her the standing, but reserved, ovation (as fitting to royals cheering a queen, hoho).

    When the homage to british musical tradition started, I thought at least now we’re going to listen to some much loved hits, but they managed this like a person listening to an old CD, hitting “next” repeatedly after hearing a couple of seconds of music that didn’t sound as appealing anymore…it was tiring…I was listening for “anarchy in the UK” or “God save the queen” but I guess that if punk had to be referenced in british olympic opening ceremony with the queen present, it had to be sanitized, enfeebled and stultified…

    There’s only one thing I liked…Mr Bean saved the day as far as I’m concerned…

    In a word, I hated it…

  2. Dr. Demetris Kamaras says:

    Thanx for the input!

Comment

AlYunaniya encourages comments, providing you use a valid e-mail address, even when you log in via Facebook or Twitter. So, the first time you post a comment, you will receive an e-mail asking you to verify your e-mail address for your comment to be published.

Connect with Facebook